'Viking Grace' (Source:https://malcolmoliver.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/vikiinggrace.jpg) |
The 'International Code of Safety for Ships Using Gases or Other Low-Flashpoint Fuels', in short the IGF Code has been adopted by the IMO and it will be in force from 1 January 2017.
In this post, I would like to offer an overview of the code and its regulatory background. It will be followed up with detailed posts on some of the chapters in the code which details the technical requirements for the shipboard arrangements.
The IGF Code
IGF Code |
'Interim Guidelines on Safety for Natural Gas-fuelled Engine Installations in Ships', MSC.285 (86)
'Interim Guidelines on Safety for Natural Gas-fuelled Engine Installations in Ships', MSC.285 (86) |
SOLAS Amendment
(Source:http://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0090/5072/products/IF110E_500x500.JPG?v=1457734659) |
The IGF Code is coming in as a mandatory code through the amendment to the SOLAS convention. Following are the relevant amendments to SOLAS. There are several other amendments to some of the relevant sections, a complete detail is available in MSC 392 (95).
- SOLAS CHAPTER II-1, Part A, Regulation 2 – Definitions
New Definition for IGF Code - SOLAS CHAPTER II-1, Part F, Regulation 55 – Alternative design and arrangements - existing paragraphs 1 to 3 are replaced to include reference to some of the arrangements onboard.
- SOLAS CHAPTER II-1, Part G, Regulation 56 – Application, Ships using low-flashpoint fuels new part G is added after the existing part F
The IGF Code, in essence is based on two pillars.
- Goal based Standards
- Risk Based Design
Goal based Standards
'Goal based Standards', is now the catch phrase within the IMO and all of the newer developments or standards developed by the IMO are based on these.
The same is followed in the IGF Code, where each chapter states a list of functional requirements that are to be satisfied. These functional requirements relate to the 'Goal and Functional requirements' of the IGF Code, stated in Chapter 3 of the Code.
The provision of these goal-based standards allows any innovative or out of the usual standard design to be proposed and evaluated in its own merit. The knowledge we have in terms of the use of gas as a fuel, though significant, is still at its infancy. IMO has rightfully acknowledged that limiting the requirements for newer designs based on current knowledge is not the way forward.
Risk Based Design
'Risk Based Design' is the second pillar of the IGF Code. The code in its current form provides well-defined prescriptive requirements for the use of LNG as fuel. However, as indicated in its title, the Code is also intended to cater for vessels using any other gases or Low flash point fuels. In addition, the Code also welcomes any deviation from these prescriptive requirements, as part of the 'Goal based approach' explained above. Accordingly, any use of fuels other than LNG and any deviation from the prescribed requirements should be addressed using the Risk Based Design approach.
Both 'Goal Based Standards' and 'Risk Based Design' allows for a whole new world of innovation to be examined and applied.
Application Dates
The dates from which the IGF Code will be applied to vessels are clearly defined in the SOLAS amendment
- ships contracted for construction on or after 1 January 2017
- ships keel laid on or after 1 July 2017, in the absence of a building contract
- ships delivered on or after 1 January 2021
- ships converted to use gaseous or other low-flashpoint fuels on or after 1January 2017
Not applicable to Gas Carriers
One of the common questions that I encounter is on whether the new IGF Code will be applied to Gas Carriers? The answer is NO. Gas carriers using their cargo as fuel would still comply with the relevant requirements from Chapter 16 of the IGC Code.
This is also clarified in SOLAS CHAPTER II-1, Part G, Regulation 56
Summary
The IGF Code is a good start and a great foundation giving the classification societies, shipyards, designer and Owners a clear set of standards to follow. As with any new code/convention, it is not perfect, but all of those short comings can be identified and addressed as we gain more service experience with this new and promising segment of gas-fuelled vessels.
Comments
Post a Comment